SDR Technology Enhances the Intelligence of Police Equipment
I. A Decade of Change in Policing Scenarios: New Challenges from Communication Technology Evolution
Over the past decade, the rapid iteration of wireless communication technologies has improved societal operational efficiency while also introducing new challenges to policing work. The proliferation of 5G communication, advancements in anti-jamming technologies, and the development of communication protocols for low-altitude scenarios have exponentially increased the complexity of the electromagnetic environment. Traditional police communication and countermeasure methods now face systemic upgrade pressures, primarily manifested in the following ways:
- Increased Security Pressure at Large-Scale Events
At large-scale events such as concerts and sports games, population density and communication traffic grow exponentially. Traditional equipment struggles to handle complex electromagnetic environments with multiple protocols and frequency bands, creating significant security challenges.

- Countermeasure Challenges for Technology-Driven Crimes
The rise of high-tech crimes, such as radio-controlled explosive devices, demands higher precision and flexibility in wireless communication jamming, further complicating policing efforts.

- Threats from Illegal Drone Activities
Unauthorized drone activities, including illegal aerial photography, disrupting public opinion, or even carrying explosives, pose new security risks to sensitive areas such as government facilities, airports, and military zones.

II. Adaptive Evolution of Police Equipment: The Inevitable Direction of SDR Technology Driven by Demand
As policing scenarios grow increasingly complex, police equipment systems are accelerating toward intelligence, integration, and autonomy. This trend imposes multiple requirements on wireless communication and countermeasure devices:
1. Intelligence: Devices must capable of flexibly processing multiple signals.
2. Integration: Modular design should simplify integration processes and reduce operational barriers.
3. Autonomy: Devices must respond dynamically to threats without human intervention.

However, with the continuous escalation of wireless communication threats - such as frequency-hopping or spread-spectrum technologies and emerging communication protocols - traditional countermeasure devices are becoming increasingly inadequate:
- Limited Frequency Bands and Fixed Functionality: Difficulty adapting to rapid iterations of new drone frequency bands and communication protocols.
- High Power Consumption: Hinders the miniaturization and portability of devices.

These limitations highlight that hardware-based fixed architectures can no longer meet the underlying needs of modern police equipment. In this context, SDR technology, with its software-defined radio architecture enabling reconfigurable physical layer functionality, has emerged as an inevitable solution to address these challenges and drive the evolution of police equipment.